Friday, February 22, 2013

Kyrie Irving or Derrick Rose?

Image from NBCchicago.com
            It may seem unfair, to make this comparison between Kyrie Irving and Derrick Rose. Unfair to who though? Kyrie, because he's only in his second year? or Rose because he's recovering from a devastating ACL injury? Obviously Irving has yet to accomplish anything significant in terms of wins, while Derrick Rose already has an MVP under him (then again Kyrie doesn't have Luol Deng and Noah on his team)
Irving is having a blistering second season sort of like Rose's second season, first time All-Star, three point shootout champion, and already considered one of the premier "clutch" players in the league. Derrick Rose on the other hand, after his amazing MVP season, was derailed all of last year by injuries until the season ending torn ACL in the first game of the Eastern Conference quarterfinals against Philadelphia. Now, Rose when healthy is clearly a top 5 player, but he's a player who depended primarily on his explosive attacks to the rim, its uncertain whether he will have that explosiveness again when he returns, albeit he will no doubt be a phenomenal player but 5 years from now will he be better than Kyrie Irving?
          Rose revolutionized the point guard position in my opinion, he was the first "point guard" to take the lead offensive role on his team (excluding the legendary Allen Iverson of course). Taking the majority of the shots and expected to score over 20 points a game every night, rather than the old school traditional point guards who pass first and shoot second. He was quickly followed by Russell Westbrook, John Wall, and now Kyrie Irving. Point guards are now expected to lead their team through scoring rather than through their passing and its all because of how Derrick Rose took the league by storm. People may disagree with his style of play, but it won him an MVP, so it must be working for him. 
        That being said, Kyrie is younger, just as fast (if not faster), and came into the league with a lethal jumper, something Rose did not, so its scary to see what this kid will be 5 years from now. Its uncertain how Rose's knee will respond, but its certain that Kyrie Irving will soon be a top 3 point guard in this league, and with Chris Paul and Russell Westbrook considered to be the top 2 right now, it leads to a very interesting debate
For his career, Rose is averaging 21 PPG and 6.8 APG on 46% shooting, Kyrie? 20.9 and 5.5 APG also on 46% shooting, the numbers aren't too far apart, and Kyrie is only in his second season. So who would you go with? the 20 year old with the good knee? Or the former MVP who has not played a game in over 300 days?

Saturday, February 9, 2013

The East is the Heat's to lose, and no team can change that

The East is the big 3's playground
The Miami Heat are the defending world champion and the back to back Eastern Conference champions. Once the month of May comes in it should be "back to back to back" Eastern Conference championships. They are first in the Conference right now, and will head into the All Star break with three All-Stars and Their whole coaching staff along the ride for the All Star game. The scary thing is, the Heat haven't even played their best basketball yet. Lebron James is playing his usual MVP dominating self, Wade is finally rounding up into his old elite self after being scrutinized for starting out slow despite coming off knee surgery, and Bosh continues to be the least talked about star in the league. When You think about potential threats to the Heat this year from the Eastern Conference, three teams come to mind: the New York Knicks, the Indiana Pacers, and the Chicago Bulls. However, the reality is none of these teams will be able to beat the Heat in a 7 game series (barring injury to any of Miami's big 3 of course).
Melo will look to take the Knicks past Miami this year
Lets begin with the New York Knicks, who are having their best season in over 10 years and led by Carmelo Anthony. The Knicks have two victories against the Heat this year and one happened to be without Anthony. Don't think too highly of these two victories though, in the first year of the Big 3 era in Miami, the Heat went a combined 1-7 against the Boston Celtics and Chicago Bulls in the regular season and proceeded to beating both the Bulls and the Celtics in 5 games each once the playoffs arrived. The Heat dismantled the Knicks in 5 games in the first round of last year's playoffs and that one loss was a product of a monster night by Carmelo Anthony. How can you expect a Knick team that will depend heavily on scoring from Anthony, JR Smith and Amar'e Stoudemire to handle the fire power of the Heat? The Heat know they can get stops down the stretch, but can you say the same about the Knicks? Who really only have 2 elite defenders in Tyson Chandler and Iman Shumpert (who happens to be coming off major ACL surgery). The Knicks are also very dependent on the three point shot, something that will not hold up in the playoffs where the game slows down and defenses key in more. Then theres' the Amar'e Stoudemire problem, Stoudemire is clearly the second best player on this team, and if you cant find a way to have both your superstars on the floor, how do you expect to beat the defending champion four times? Amar'e was putting up monster numbers before Anthony arrived, but it seems that its impossible for Anthony to have a second star alongside himself who can score 20 plus points a game. Speaking of Anthony, what makes anybody think that Carmelo Anthony can lead a team to a championship? Carmelo Anthony has been in the playoffs every year of his  career, and he's only been out of the first round ONCE, in 10 years. That one year he got out happened to be the year that Chauncey Billups arrived to Denver and who came in with a streak of multiple years of making it to the Conference finals. Carmelo Anthony is not the elite defenders, that Lebron James and Dwyane Wade are, and quite frankly he has done nothing to merit the trust of being able to beat the defending champion let alone make it to the NBA finals. How about they win a playoff series first before we deem them good enough to dethrone the Heat.
Then there's the Indiana Pacers, who many credit (me included) as the main reason the Heat won last year's NBA title. Indiana could not beat the Heat with Chris Bosh out and Shane Battier guarding power forwards and Centers for 6 straight games and with a Healthy Danny Granger. The Pacers are a great defensive team, but they lack a true star even with Granger, and while Paul George is having a marvelous season, he cannot carry the Pacers in a 7 game series.  You know where the points are going to come from the Heat, but where are the Pacers going to get enough fire power to match the defending champions?
The Chicago Bulls are having a great season, but all hopes are on Derrick Rose coming back and being the old Derrick Rose, and thats not realistic. Even with a healthy Rose, two seasons ago the Bulls could not match up with the Heat. That wont change, the Bulls should be good enough to win one playoff series, but thats about it. Remember Derrick Rose scored primarily on his explosive assaults on the rim, something he wont have back for a while, maybe until next year.
So in the end, the east is the Heat's to lose, and no team in the East will change that. The Heat have defeated each of these teams in the playoffs, and there should be no reason why it wont happen again.

Images from Bleacherreport.com